<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>The Market Works : Releases</title>
    <link>http://www.themarketworks.org</link>
    <description>The Market Works</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 19:56:46 CDT</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-us</language>

    <item>
     <title>USDA Proposed Rule on Livestock Marketing Could Cost U.S. 104,000 Jobs and Reduces GDP by $14 Billion, New Economic Impact Study Shows</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/63660</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/63660</guid>
     <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
     <description>An estimated 104,000 Americans could lose their jobs if a new U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) regulatory proposal is finalized, according to a study conducted by John Dunham and Associates and commissioned by the American Meat Institute (AMI).</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>American Meat Institute Calls GIPSA Rule Raw Deal for Packers and Producers Alike</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/62357</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/62357</guid>
     <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
     <description>Onerous Proposal Would Destroy Partnerships, Progress that Have Spurred Growth in Livestock, Meat and Poultry Sector</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>American Meat Institute Says USDA Proposed Rule on 'Undue Preferences' Constitutes Regulatory End-Run Around Judicial Rulings</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/60400</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/60400</guid>
     <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
     <description>Massive Proposal Would Turn Clock Back on the Progress that Has Made U.S. Meat Industry World-Class</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>American Meat Institute Tells U.S. Trade Representative that Mandatory Country-of-Origin Labeling Violates International Trade Obligations</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/56358</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/56358</guid>
     <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
     <description>The American Meat Institute (AMI) today told the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative that mandatory country-of-origin labeling (COOL) violates the United States' international trade obligations for many reasons and that the U.S. must honor these obligations.</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>American Meat Institute Tells Department of Justice Existing Antitrust and Competition Statutes Are Effective and Applicable for All Industries</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/56322</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/56322</guid>
     <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
     <description>Economy Is Best Served By Consistent Application of a Uniform Set Of Rules, Not By Hasty Reactions to Market Behavior</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>American Meat Institute Launches New Web Site www.TheMarketWorks.org to Demonstrate How the Meat Industry Responds to Input from Customers</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2631</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2631</guid>
     <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
     <description>Institute Says Legislation to Prohibit Meat Companies' Ability to Own or Contract for Livestock Will Dismantle Progress</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>American Meat Institute Says Ban on Packer Ownership of Livestock "Detrimental to Entire Livestock Sector"</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2575</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2575</guid>
     <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
     <description>Institute Opposes Legislative and Regulatory Efforts to Restrict Livestock Marketing and Meat Packing Procurement Opportunities</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>American Meat Institute Says Government Data and Economic Analyses Show Meat Packing Industry Is Dynamic, Competitive</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2600</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2600</guid>
     <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
     <description>Institute Opposes Legislative and Regulatory Efforts to Restrict Livestock Marketing and Meat Packing Procurement Opportunities</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>AMI Submits Testimony at Nebraska Congressional Hearings on Packer Livestock Ownership Ban</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2580</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2580</guid>
     <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2003 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
     <description>&lt;DIV class=text&gt;Washington, DC - The American Meat Institute (AMI) strongly opposes efforts to restrict the ways in which meat packers conduct business. AMI submitted comments stating this opposition at a hearing today in Grand Island, Neb., to discuss a potential ban on packer ownership and control of livestock. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"Coordination and even vertical integration between manufacturers and their suppliers is driven largely by consumer demand for consistent product quality at...</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>MEAT INDUSTRY SHOULD BE PERMITTED TO OPERATE LIKE OTHER U.S. BUSINESSES</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2945</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2945</guid>
     <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2002 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
     <description>AMI Says Efforts to Restrict Livestock Sourcing Will Reverse Quality and Progress</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>MEAT INDUSTRY OPPOSES EFFORTS TO MAKE MODERN BUSINESS MODEL ILLEGAL FOR MEAT PACKERS</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2986</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2986</guid>
     <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
     <description>Industry Says Efforts to Outlaw Packer Ownership of Livestock Will Turn Clock Back on Quality and Progress</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>Statement of the American Meat Institute on Ag Economists' Debate Over Packer Ownership Ban</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/3000</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/3000</guid>
     <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
     <description>&lt;DIV class=text&gt;
&lt;CENTER&gt;&lt;I&gt;(Attribute Statement to AMI President and CEO J. Patrick Boyle)&lt;/CENTER&gt;&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Today, another paper by agricultural economists was released - the fourth in the past two months - attempting to explain the market impact of an amendment in the Senate's farm bill banning packer ownership, feeding and control of livestock. Their views differ sharply with other economists.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The fact that leading ag...</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>Statement of the American Meat Institute on Senate's Adoption of a Revised Ban on Packer Ownership, Feeding and Control of Livestock</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2845</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2845</guid>
     <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2002 00:00:00 CST</pubDate>
     <description>(Attribute Statement to AMI President J. Patrick Boyle)</description>
   </item>
    <item>
     <title>Consolidation in Agriculture, Other Industries Is an Effort to Become More Competitive</title>
     <link>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2917</link>
     <guid>http://www.themarketworks.org/ht/d/ReleaseDetails/i/2917</guid>
     <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2001 00:00:00 CDT</pubDate>
     <description>Efforts to Impose New and Unique Requirements on Agriculture Are Unnecessary and Unfair</description>
   </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
